ARTICLE II - PURPOSE AND MANDATE
1. ARGOS provides early warning and strategic risk assessment relating to:
regional instability;
governance breakdown with security implications;
escalation and miscalculation risk;
overseas and cross-border security spillover.
2. ARGOS serves national decision-making through analysis only.
3. ARGOS shall not:
conduct military, intelligence, or law-enforcement operations;
implement policy or humanitarian action;
issue binding directives.
ARTICLE VI - MEMBERSHIP TIERS
Section 1 - Tier 1 - Core Member
Tier 1 Members are States that meet the Tier 1 criteria under Article XXXII and are entitled to:
default access to ARGOS-TS, ARGOS-S, and ARGOS-R;
eligibility for the Emergency Security Board;
full participation in strategic governance.
Section 2 - Tier 2 - Standard Members
Tier 2 Members are States that meet the Tier 2 criteria under Article XXXII and are entitled to:
default access to ARGOS-S and ARGOS-R;
conditional access to defined ARGOS-TS products as determined under internal procedures.
Section 3 - Tier 3 - Restricted Members
Tier 3 Members are States that meet Tier 3 criteria under Article XXXII and are entitled to:
access only to ARGOS-R;
no eligibility for the ESB.
Section 4 - Non-Permanence
Tier status is not permanent and not fixed. It is subject to review, upgrade, downgrade, and sanctions under this Constitution.
Section 5 - Definition of Democratic Governance
1. Democratic Governance Standard
For the purposes of this Constitution, a Member State shall be considered a democratic State where it demonstrates compliance with the core thematic pillars of the Economist Intelligence Unit (EIU) Democracy Index methodology, specifically maintaining:
Electoral Process and Pluralism: Free, fair, and competitive elections for national legislative and executive authority, paired with a robust legal right for political opposition to organize and contest power without systemic obstruction;
Civil Liberties: Comprehensive legal and practical protection of basic civil rights, including freedom of expression, association, assembly, and political participation;
Democratic Oversight and Civilian Authority: Direct, uninterrupted civilian executive control and legislative oversight over the military, police, and intelligence services, ensuring no independent political role, parallel authority, or shadow governance structures exist outside elected institutions;
Objective Empirical Baseline: A sustained quantitative classification as either a "Full Democracy" or a "Flawed Democracy" on the annual Economist Intelligence Unit (EIU) Democracy Index, establishing the definitive external empirical baseline for Tier 1 and Tier 2 eligibility.
2. Loss of Democratic Status
A State shall be deemed not to meet the democratic governance standard where one or more of the following conditions exist:
Military coup, unconstitutional seizure of executive power, or systemic subversion of elected officials by security forces or unelected factions;
Abolition, suspension, or systematic nullification of national democratic processes;
An official downgrading on the external global dataset specified in paragraph 1 to a classification denoting a "Hybrid Regime" or an "Authoritarian Regime."
3. Assessment and Review
The determination of whether a State meets the democratic governance standard shall be made through review procedures under Article XXX and may be subject to periodic reassessment by the Office of the Inspector-General.
In conducting baseline and periodic eligibility assessments, the Office of the Inspector-General shall formally integrate the annual analytical data from the Economist Intelligence Unit (EIU) Democracy Index to verify ongoing compliance with the requirements set out in paragraph 1 of this Section.
An official downgrade of an existing Tier 1 or Tier 2 Member State to a "Hybrid Regime" or "Authoritarian Regime" by the EIU shall automatically trigger an Extraordinary Governance Review under Article XXX by the Office of the Inspector-General to evaluate immediate tier downgrade or suspension.
ARTICLE VIII - GOVERNANCE
Section 1 - Governing Council
1. The Governing Council shall be composed of all Member States.
2. The Governing Council shall be the supreme decision-making body of ARGOS.
3. The Governing Council shall adopt decisions in accordance with the voting rules of this Constitution and the procedures established under Article XXXIV.
Section 2 - Voting Weight Calculation
1. Voting weight shall be calculated such that:
A Tier 1 Member carries ten (10) times the base weight of a Tier 3 Member.
A Tier 2 Member carries four (4) times the base weight of a Tier 3 Member.
2. Within each Tier, weight shall vary based on position within the contribution band. Higher contribution within the band yields higher weight within the Tier.
3. Total voting weight of all Members shall equal 100%.
4. No single Member State shall exceed twenty percent (20%) voting weight regardless of calculation.
5. Voting weights shall be recalculated upon:
Admission of a new Member State;
Tier upgrade or downgrade of any Member State;
Withdrawal or expulsion of any Member State.
Section 3 - Contribution and Tier Assignment
1. Tier assignment requires satisfaction of all applicable criteria, including governance, reliability, and contribution requirements.
2. A Member State meeting governance and compliance criteria shall not be assigned to a higher Tier unless it also meets the contribution band for that Tier.
Section 4 - Tier 1 Internal Equality Principle ("Core Member Balance")
1. Tier 1 voting weights shall be approximately equal among Tier 1 Member States, reflecting shared Core Member responsibility.
2. A limited "Major Contributor Bonus" may apply to the single highest net contributor among Tier 1 Members.
3. The Major Contributor Bonus shall not exceed two (2) percentage points above the Tier 1 baseline range.
4. The Tier 1 Internal Equality Principle shall not override the financing rules under Article IX.
Section 5 - Cap on Voting Weight (No Veto-by-Weight)
1. No Member State shall hold more than 20.0% of the total voting weight of ARGOS.
2. No veto rights shall exist in ARGOS, whether by legal rule, voting design, or informal practice.
Section 6 - No State Purchase of Institutional Control
1. Voting weight shall not be increased solely by financial overpayment beyond required contribution bands.
2. Contributions above the maximum financing limit under Article IX shall confer no additional voting power and shall not create any entitlement to additional access, privileges, or institutional influence.
Section 7 - Stability and Predictability
1. Voting weights shall not be recalculated continuously or politically.
2. Voting weights shall remain fixed except as provided under Section 2, paragraph 5.
Section 8 - Voting Weight Review Cycle
1. The voting weight formula may be reviewed once every ten (10) years.
2. Review and reallocation shall constitute a Track II decision under Article XI.
3. A review shall not take effect retroactively.
4. The purpose of the review shall be:
to reflect long-term shifts in contribution and integration; and
to preserve Tier-based stability and institutional continuity.
ARTICLE IX - FINANCING
1. ARGOS operates on 3-5 year budget cycles.
2. Tier 1 Members must contribute 0.015-0.025% of GDP annually.
3. Tier 2 Members shall contribute 0.006-0.015% of GDP annually.
4. Tier 3 Members shall contribute 0.001-0.004% of GDP annually.
5. No State may finance more than 25% of the total budget.
6. Contributions above 25% are permitted but confer no additional power, voting weight, or access.
7. ARGOS maintains reserves covering 8-12 months.
8. Persistent failure to meet minimum contribution requirements (two or more consecutive cycles) shall result in expulsion proceedings under Article XXXVII.
ARTICLE IX-A - STRATEGIC INNOVATION ENDOWMENT
Section 1 — Establishment and Purpose
1. There is hereby established an ARGOS Strategic Innovation Endowment (the “Endowment”), separate and distinct from the General Budget financed under Article IX.
2. The Endowment exists to ensure that ARGOS maintains methodological, technological, and analytical superiority in pursuit of its mandate under Article II. Sustained innovation capacity is an institutional necessity, not a discretionary activity.
3. The Endowment shall finance:
research and development of analytical methodologies, models, and forecasting tools;
development and maintenance of proprietary technology, software, and secure systems;
experimental and pilot capabilities;
hardware acquisition, upgrade, and modernisation relevant to analytical and security infrastructure;
institutional resilience measures, including reserve supplementation and continuity infrastructure.
4. The Endowment shall not finance operational action, military capability, intelligence collection, or any activity outside the mandate defined in Article II.
5. The innovation agenda of the Endowment shall serve the institutional mission of ARGOS as a whole. No Member State shall direct, steer, or control the Endowment’s research priorities by virtue of its financial contribution, Tier status, or any other basis.
Section 2 — Initial Capitalisation
1. The capitalisation target for the Endowment shall be seven billion United States dollars (USD 7,000,000,000), to be reached within three (3) years of entry into force of this Constitution (the “Capitalisation Window”).
2. Upon entry into force, each Founding Member State shall make a single, non-recurring capitalisation payment to the Endowment as follows:
Tier 1 Member: three hundred fifty million United States dollars (USD 350,000,000) per State;
Tier 2 Member: thirty million United States dollars (USD 30,000,000) per State;
Tier 3 Member: ten million United States dollars (USD 10,000,000) per State.
3. Capitalisation payments are flat, fixed per Tier, and non-negotiable. They are not calculated from GDP, are not linked to Article IX contribution bands, and are not subject to individual adjustment.
4. Capitalisation payments shall be made in two (2) equal instalments:
(a) the first instalment due upon ratification or admission;
(b) the second instalment due twelve (12) months thereafter.
5. Failure to complete capitalisation within the required period shall constitute a breach of this Constitution.
Section 3 — Capitalisation Shortfall
1. If the Endowment has not reached the capitalisation target by the end of the Capitalisation Window, per-State contributions shall be automatically recalculated upward to close the shortfall, maintaining the Tier ratio established in Section 2.
2. Recalculation is automatic and shall not require a vote of the Governing Council. The capitalisation target is a constitutional obligation, not a discretionary goal.
3. No Member State shall be required to pay, in total, more than two and one-half times (2.5x) its original Tier capitalisation fee as a result of recalculation under this Section.
4. Where the capitalisation target cannot be met even with the application of the 2.5x cap, the Endowment shall commence operations at its actual capitalisation level and shall grow toward the target through new Member admissions under Section 4.
Section 4 — New Member Capitalisation
1. Each State admitted to ARGOS after entry into force shall, as a condition of admission, make a single capitalisation payment to the Endowment at the applicable Tier rate.
2. The applicable Tier rate shall be the founding rate adjusted for inflation using a recognised international index, such as the IMF Special Drawing Rights basket or equivalent, calculated as of the date of admission.
3. New Member capitalisation payments shall be made in two (2) equal instalments in accordance with Section 2, paragraph 4.
4. All new Member capitalisation payments shall be added to the Endowment principal.
Section 5 — Tier Upgrade Capitalisation
1. Upon upgrade to a higher Tier, a Member State shall pay the difference between its previous Tier capitalisation fee and the higher Tier capitalisation fee, adjusted for inflation in accordance with Section 4, paragraph 2.
2. Upgrade capitalisation payments shall be made in two (2) equal instalments over twenty-four (24) months from the date of upgrade.
3. Failure to complete upgrade capitalisation within the required period shall constitute a breach of this Constitution.
Section 6 — Permanence of Capital
1. All funds deposited into the Endowment, whether through initial capitalisation, new Member contributions, upgrade payments, or voluntary contributions, shall be permanent and irreversible.
2. No Member State, organ of ARGOS, or external party shall withdraw, reclaim, or redirect Endowment capital for any purpose, except as provided under Section 8 (Annual Draw) and Section 15 (Dissolution).
3. No Member State shall acquire any right of reimbursement, refund, or offset by reason of its Endowment contribution, including upon withdrawal under Article XXII or expulsion under Article XXXIX.
Section 7 — Investment Policy
1. The Endowment shall be invested with the primary objective of preserving capital and the secondary objective of generating stable returns.
2. Investment policy and the selection of permitted instruments shall be determined by internal regulation, subject to the capital preservation principle in paragraph 1.
3. An Endowment Investment Board shall be established to manage the investment of the Endowment. The Investment Board shall consist of three (3) to five (5) members, comprising a mix of senior ARGOS officials and independent external experts with relevant experience in sovereign wealth, central banking, or institutional endowment management.
4. Members of the Investment Board shall be appointed by the Director-General and confirmed by the Oversight Board. External members shall serve fixed, staggered terms of five (5) years. No member of the Investment Board shall take national instruction or represent any Member State.
5. The Oversight Board shall supervise the Investment Board. The Office of the Inspector-General shall audit the Endowment annually.
Section 8 — Annual Draw
1. Each fiscal year, the Endowment shall release funds for research and development purposes (the “Annual Draw”).
2. The Annual Draw shall equal the actual investment returns generated by the Endowment in the preceding fiscal year.
3. Where actual investment returns in a given year fall below four percent (4%) of the Endowment principal, the Annual Draw shall nonetheless be four percent (4%) of the principal (the “Guaranteed Minimum Draw”). The difference between actual returns and the Guaranteed Minimum Draw shall be drawn from the principal.
4. The Guaranteed Minimum Draw ensures that research and development activity is never interrupted or reduced below a viable level due to short-term market conditions.
Section 9 — Principal Safety Threshold and Mandatory Recapitalisation
1. If at any time the Endowment principal falls below seventy percent (70%) of the inflation-adjusted capitalisation target, mandatory recapitalisation shall be triggered automatically.
2. Mandatory recapitalisation is not subject to vote. It is a constitutional obligation triggered by the threshold condition in paragraph 1.
3. Recapitalisation contributions shall follow the founding Tier ratio, adjusted for inflation, and shall be payable in two (2) equal instalments over twenty-four (24) months.
4. The Guaranteed Minimum Draw under Section 8 shall continue during recapitalisation. Research and development activity shall not be suspended or reduced during recapitalisation.
5. Failure to meet recapitalisation obligations shall constitute a breach of this Constitution.
Section 10 — Voluntary Contributions
1. Any Member State may at any time make voluntary financial contributions to the Endowment above and beyond its capitalisation obligations.
2. Voluntary contributions shall be added to the Endowment principal and shall be subject to the permanence rule under Section 6. Once contributed, funds may not be withdrawn.
3. Voluntary contributions shall confer no additional voting weight, Tier status, access, privileges, or institutional influence of any kind. Article VIII, Section 6 applies in full.
4. A contributing State may, at the time of contribution, submit non-binding recommendations regarding research priorities. Such recommendations shall be received and considered by the Head of Research but shall carry no binding weight and shall not constrain the research agenda.
5. No single voluntary contribution or series of contributions by one Member State shall exceed twenty percent (20%) of the total Endowment principal at the time of contribution.
Section 11 — Advanced Exploration for Global Innovation and Security (AEGIS)
1. The Endowment shall be operationally managed through the Advanced Exploration for Global Innovation and Security (AEGIS).
2. AEGIS shall be located in San Diego, California, United States of America.
3. AEGIS shall operate under a Host State Agreement with the United States, separate from the Operational Headquarters agreement, guaranteeing operational independence, non-interference, functional immunity, and protection of secure infrastructure in accordance with Article XXI.
4. AEGIS shall comply with the facility ring system under Article XXVI. Research and development work at ARGOS-TS and ARGOS-S classification levels shall be conducted within Ring 1 areas.
5. The location of AEGIS may be changed only by Track II decision of the Governing Council.
Section 12 — Head of Research
1. The Director-General shall appoint a Head of Research to lead AEGIS. The appointment shall be confirmed by the Oversight Board.
2. The Head of Research shall serve without fixed term, subject to removal by the Director-General with Oversight Board confirmation.
3. The Head of Research shall:
manage the research and development project pipeline;
propose annual allocation of the Annual Draw to the Director-General;
evaluate, approve, and terminate projects in accordance with the research philosophy under Section 13;
report to the Director-General.
4. No Member State shall influence the appointment or removal of the Head of Research on the basis of nationality, contribution, or Tier status.
Section 13 — Research Philosophy and Risk Management
1. The Endowment shall pursue innovative, experimental, and where necessary high-risk capability development. AEGIS exists to ensure that ARGOS leads rather than follows in analytical and technological capability. An institutional culture of caution, risk-avoidance, or preference for guaranteed outcomes over transformative potential is incompatible with this mandate. It is accepted and expected that not all research investments will yield successful outcomes.
2. AEGIS shall prioritise transformative potential over guaranteed results and shall accept project failure as inherent to ambitious research. AEGIS shall fund fewer projects at the scale necessary to succeed rather than distribute resources across many projects at levels insufficient to produce results. Underfunding a viable project is as wasteful as overfunding a non-viable one. Conservative allocation across the entire portfolio is a failure of institutional purpose.
3. The following principles shall govern research investment decisions:
(a) Projects shall be funded at the scale required to achieve their objectives. A project with genuine transformative potential shall not be denied adequate funding solely on the basis of uncertainty. Risk assessment shall inform the portfolio balance but shall not be used to reduce individual project budgets below the level at which success is realistically achievable. AEGIS shall not commit disproportionate resources to projects with very low assessed probability of success, but shall equally not restrict meaningful funding to only near-certain outcomes.
(b) AEGIS shall maintain a balanced portfolio ensuring that the failure of any single project, or the simultaneous failure of several, does not eliminate AEGIS’s capacity to continue research operations. Portfolio balance shall be achieved through project selection and diversification, not by artificially reducing individual project budgets.
(c) Each project shall have milestones, review timelines, and progress criteria defined at the time of approval, appropriate to the nature, complexity, and expected duration of the project. Reviews shall verify that resources are being used for their intended purpose, that the work is actively progressing, and that the underlying approach remains viable. Projects shall be terminated where the scientific or technical basis has been invalidated, where resources are being misused, or where work has effectively ceased. Sunk cost shall not justify continued funding. Reviews shall not be used to impose artificial pressure for premature results on projects whose approved timelines reasonably require extended development.
(d) Review and termination decisions shall be made by the Head of Research. Detailed evaluation criteria and review procedures shall be established under internal regulation.
(e) Projects with genuine transformative potential and reasonable assessed feasibility shall be funded at adequate scale regardless of whether the Annual Draw is at, near, or above the Guaranteed Minimum. Only investments in projects with very low assessed probability of success shall be conditional on the availability of surplus returns above the Guaranteed Minimum Draw. In years of high returns, AEGIS may pursue such high-risk exploratory investments at meaningful scale. In constrained years, AEGIS shall not allocate scarce resources to extreme longshots at the expense of viable research.
4. AEGIS shall maintain compensation standards sufficient to attract and retain personnel competitive with leading national and private-sector research institutions.
Section 14 — Revision of the Capitalisation Target
1. The Governing Council may, by Track II decision, revise the capitalisation target upward to reflect long-term growth in membership, institutional requirements, or inflation beyond index adjustments.
2. The capitalisation target shall not be revised downward.
3. Upon upward revision, additional capitalisation contributions shall be assessed in accordance with the Tier ratio and instalment procedures established in this Article.
Section 15 — Dissolution
1. Upon dissolution of ARGOS under Article XXIII, the Endowment principal and any accumulated returns shall be:
(a) transferred to a successor organisation, where one is established, for purposes consistent with Article II; or
(b) in the absence of a successor organisation, transferred to a neutral international trust with a mandate consistent with Article II, as determined by the Governing Council.
2. Dissolution of ARGOS is the sole exception to the permanence rule under Section 6.
3. The decision on the disposition of Endowment assets upon dissolution shall be taken by the same majority required for dissolution under Article XXIII.
Section 16 — Relationship to Article IX
1. The Endowment operates independently of the General Budget under Article IX.
2. Endowment capitalisation payments shall not count toward Article IX contribution obligations, and Article IX contributions shall not count toward Endowment obligations.
3. The Governing Council may, by ordinary Track II decision, allocate supplementary funds from the General Budget to AEGIS for specific research purposes. Such allocations are voluntary and shall not create recurring obligations.
4. Supplementary allocations under paragraph 3 shall be subject to the same governance, audit, and non-steering provisions as Endowment funds.
ARTICLE XII - EMERGENCY SECURITY BOARD (ESB)
Section 1 - Composition
The ESB shall be composed of:
Director-General (non-voting);
Deputy Director-General (voting);
five (5) to six (6) Tier 1 Member States, rotating;
two (2) to three (3) Tier 2 Member States, rotating.
Exact composition shall be determined by internal rules and adjusted proportionally as total membership grows.
Section 2 - Deputies
1. The Deputy Director-General is a senior ARGOS official appointed under Article X.
2. The Deputy supports continuity of leadership and emergency coordination.
3. The Deputy acts independently of national direction and shall not serve as a State representative.
Section 3 - Rotation
ESB rotation shall occur every 18-24 months with geographic balance ensured under internal rules.
Section 4 - ESB Powers
The ESB may:
trigger cybersecurity and integrity safeguards;
restrict access to systems and outputs;
activate segmentation and containment procedures;
recommend emergency Track II sessions.
Section 5 - ESB Limits
The ESB may not:
authorize military, intelligence, or law-enforcement operations;
override this Constitution;
issue binding directives to Member States.
Section 6 - Quorum and Voting
1. The ESB may act only when at least five (5) voting members are present, including at least two (2) Tier 2 Member States.
2. Decisions require a simple majority of votes cast.
3. At least one (1) affirmative vote from a Tier 2 Member State is required for any decision to pass.
4. Weighted voting shall not apply within the ESB. Each member holds one (1) vote.
Section 7 - Probationary Restriction
Newly Upgraded Tier 1 Members may not serve on the Emergency Security Board during the probationary period under Article XXXII.
ARTICLE XVI - ARMED CONFLICT FIREWALL
Section 1 - Definition
For purposes of this Constitution, "armed conflict" includes:
any sustained use of armed force by a Member State outside its territory; or
cross-border hostilities involving military forces, drones, special operations, or proxy armed groups under State direction; or
offensive action in another State’s territory not justified by lawful defense.
Section 2 - Defense and NATO Exceptions
The following do not automatically trigger the firewall:
lawful self-defense consistent with Article 51 of the UN Charter;
collective defense under NATO Article 5 or equivalent treaty-based defense;
deployments requested by a host government for defensive support.
Section 3 - Affirmation of Self-Defense Claims
1. A claim of lawful self-defense under this Article shall be affirmed only where supported by not less than two-thirds (2/3) of weighted votes cast within thirty (30) days of ESB review.
2. Absent such affirmation, the Armed Conflict Firewall shall apply.
Section 4 - Firewall Trigger
If a Member initiates armed conflict outside lawful defense:
access to ARGOS-TS and ARGOS-S is immediately terminated;
ESB participation ceases.
Section 5 - Restoration
Access may resume only after conflict cessation and formal review under Article XXXVII.
Section 6 - Host State and Armed Conflict Firewall
1. Where a Host State triggers the Armed Conflict Firewall, the Host State shall lose all access to ARGOS facilities on its territory. Operations shall continue under ARGOS authority.
2. Obstruction, attempted seizure, or actual seizure of an ARGOS facility shall constitute a Level III incident under Article XXXIII, triggering immediate evacuation, data denial, and relocation procedures.
3. The responsible State shall face expulsion proceedings under Article XXXVII.
ARTICLE XVIII - DATA DENIAL, SYSTEM COLLAPSE & SELF-DESTRUCTION
Section 1 - Principle
ARGOS employs layered data-denial mechanisms to prevent compromise and ensure institutional survival.
Section 2 - Data Denial Procedures
1. Data denial procedures shall be scaled to available time:
(a) Where time permits: destruction of encryption keys, secure erasure through multiple overwrites, and physical destruction of storage media.
(b) Where immediate response is required: instantaneous destruction of encryption keys, isolation of compromised segments, and system-wide key rotation.
2. ARGOS security architecture shall ensure that no attacker, whether successful in penetration or not, shall obtain actionable intelligence. All breach scenarios shall result in zero exploitable gain for the attacker.
Section 3 - Trigger Levels
Data-denial may be activated when one or more of the following occur:
confirmed hostile intrusion at ARGOS-TS or ARGOS-S systems;
confirmed insider compromise involving Ring 1 systems;
imminent physical seizure of a facility;
Host State coercive entry classified as Level III under Article XXXIII;
deliberate ORCON breach.
Section 4 - Authority
1. The Director-General may authorize staged data-denial.
2. In imminent compromise situations, designated security officials may activate emergency data-denial, subject to ex post review.
Section 5 - Priority
Institutional survival takes precedence over data preservation.
ARTICLE XIX - COLD CONTINUITY VAULTS
Section 1 - Purpose
ARGOS maintains physically air-gapped continuity vaults.
Section 2 - Contents
Vaults store:
the skeleton of the system.
Vaults do not store live or actionable intelligence.
Section 3 - Access
Access requires multi-party, time-delayed authorization.
Section 4 - Reconstitution
Following global data denial, ARGOS may be reconstituted from Cold Continuity Vaults by decision of the remaining Member States.
ARTICLE XXI - HEADQUARTERS, NODES, HOST STATES & RELOCATION
Section 1 - Dual Headquarters Structure
1. ARGOS shall maintain two principal headquarters:
(a) The Political Headquarters in Geneva, Switzerland, serving as the legal seat, diplomatic interface, administrative center, and meeting place of the Governing Council and Oversight Board.
(b) The Operational Headquarters in Northern Virginia, United States, serving as the center for analytical coordination and operational management of the Regional Nodes.
2. Neither headquarters location shall confer additional authority or voting weight upon the Host State.
3. The Standby Host for the Operational Headquarters (Ottawa, Canada) shall maintain continuous operational readiness, including permanent staff presence and active systems.
Section 2 - Primary Regional Nodes
ARGOS shall maintain permanent Primary Regional Nodes with autonomous analytical capacity, secure infrastructure, and continuity functions.
(a) Europe
London, United Kingdom
Standby Host: Berlin, Federal Republic of Germany
(b) North America
Washington, D.C. / Northern Virginia, United States of America
Standby and Redundant Node: Ottawa, Canada
(c) Africa
Nairobi, Republic of Kenya
Standby Host: Pretoria, Republic of South Africa
(d) South America
Santiago de Chile, Republic of Chile
Standby Host: Buenos Aires, Argentine Republic
(e) Asia-Pacific
Tokyo, Japan
Standby Host: Canberra, Australia
Section 3 - Host State Agreements
1. All facilities operate under Host State Agreements.
2. HSAs shall guarantee:
operational independence;
non-interference;
functional immunity;
protection of secure infrastructure.
3. Each Primary Regional Node shall have:
one active Host State Agreement;
at least one pre-negotiated Standby Host Agreement.
Section 4 - Independence Safeguard
No Host State shall acquire authority over ARGOS operations, personnel, systems, or outputs by virtue of hosting an ARGOS facility.
Section 5 - Standby Continuity
1. Each Primary Regional Node shall at all times have a designated Standby Host.
2. Where a Standby Host is activated as Primary, ARGOS shall negotiate a replacement Standby Host Agreement within twelve (12) months.
Section 6 - Standby Facility Standards
1. Standby Hosts shall maintain core ARGOS infrastructure capable of rapid expansion to full operational capacity.
2. Standby facilities shall maintain an institutional character consistent with ARGOS’s status as an international organisation.
3. Activation of a Standby facility shall be achievable without new construction.
Section 7 - Legal Seat
Geneva shall serve as the legal seat of ARGOS for all treaty, jurisdictional, and diplomatic purposes.